Central embalming facilities (like those utilized by SCI or Stewart funeral home clusters) can really save a substantial amount of money by consolidating supplies, equipment and staff.
But they can also cost a lot of money, especially when an overworked or underpaid and inattentive staff-member mistakenly switches the ID tags on two bodies.
That’s what happened to an SCI firm in Stickney, Illinois, as detailed in this Chicago Tribune story.
SCI spokesperson, Jennifer Brandino, responded to the story, saying ”We continue to work with both families involved and are committed to resolving the issue to their satisfaction.”
When I worked for SCI, “resolving the issue to their satisfaction” usually meant paying money or refunding the cost of services.
It’s one of the pitfalls of running bigger operations where the person doing the embalming has never met the family or the deceased: mistakes are made more often.
I wonder if the negative impact of this story can be dismissed because of all the money they saved by consolidating their embalming and preparation processes?
Editor’s Note: This story is not an indictment of SCI or any other corporate firm. If anything, I hope our corporate readers will consider that the way they’re consolidated brings different challenges than a smaller, family-run and family-sized operation.

July 17, 2008 at 1:39 pm
Source URL: http://www.southtownstar.com/news/1058005,071608wrongbody.article
I read the above story (yesterday via FuneralWire.com)regarding the same article you mention with a different quote from Jennifer Brandino…
Mount Auburn Funeral Home is owned by Houston-based Service Corp. International, the nation’s largest funeral-services company. Service Corp. purchased Mount Auburn along with a number of other area funeral homes from Alderwoods Group Inc. two years ago.
Jennifer Brandino, a spokeswoman for Service Corp., declined to discuss the matter in any detail, citing requests from members of both of the affected families.
“We are committed to resolving the issue,” she said. “I’m just not at liberty to disclose any more specific information — We’re still looking into this one.”
It was the last half dozen words of her quote that bothered me. I am sure some softer gentler (maybe even caring) words could have been used.
It also makes me feel that she deals with this situation regularly… but come to think of it an SCI firm here in Ontario, Canada had the same situation a year ago so maybe she does and maybe to her this is just another one!
Thomas Poolton